P. Sathish v. D. Purushothman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN A.S.No.508 of 2013 1.P.Sathish 2.P.Kumar ... Plaintiffs/Appellants Vs.

1.D.Purushothaman 2.Nirmala Devi 3.T.Ranganathan ... Defendants/Respondents Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 & Order XLI Rule1 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree of the Additional District and Sessions Judge,(Fast Track Court V),Chennai passed in O.S.No.6230 of 2005 on 11.05.2010. For Appellants :No appearance.

For Respondents :Mr.G. Mohana Rangan for R3

O R D E R

The appeal was listed on 23.06.2017 before the Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.Kirubakaran and since there was no appearance, it was directed to be posted "for dismissal" after two weeks.

2.The matter was listed before me yesterday and since there was no representation for the appellants, I had directed the appeal to be listed today, "for Dismissal". Even today, none appears for the appellants.

3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. s/d- Assistant Registrar(CCC) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar nl/mfa https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court V), Chennai.

2. The Section Officer V.R. Section High Court, Madras +1 CC to Mr.G. Mohanarangan, Advocate sr 48936 A.S.No.508 of 2013 SP(31/07/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/