Madras High CourtWP/25517/2017disposed of

R.Singaram, v. The Tahsildar,

2017-09-22Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.09.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.25517 of 2017 R.Singaram

...Petitioner

1 The Tahsildar Virudachalam Taluk Cuddalore District 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer Cuddalore Road Virudachalam Taluk Cuddalore District ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue patta in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.288/6B, admeasuring 0.26.0 Ares (64 cents), R.S.No.489/3B admeasuring 0.09.0 Ares (22 cents) R.S.No.495/2B admeasuring 0.30.5 Ares (75 cents) and RS.S.No.502/5 admeasuring 1.04.0 Ares ( 2 Acres & 57 cents) situated at Mudanai Village, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District.

For Petitioner : Mr.Illanthiraiyan for M/s.Sai Bharath and Ilan For Respondents : Mr.Era. Premnath Government Advocate

O R D E R

Mr.Era. Premnath, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue patta in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.288/6B, measuring an extent of 0.26.0 Ares (64 cents), R.S.No.489/3B measuring an extent of 0.09.0 Ares (22 cents) R.S.No.495/2B measuring an extent of 0.30.5 Ares (75 cents) and RS.S.No.502/5 measuring an extent of 1.04.0 Ares ( 2 Acres & 57 cents) situated at Mudanai Village, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that it would be suffice to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.06.2017, in accordance with law.

4. Mr.Era. Premnath, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents may be

directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.06.2017, and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks.

5.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.06.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

22.09.2017 Index: Yes/No Rj To 1 The Tahsildar Virudachalam Taluk Cuddalore District 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer Cuddalore Road Virudachalam Taluk Cuddalore District

M.DURAISWAMY,J.

Rj W.P.No.25517 of 2017 22.09.2017