Madras High CourtWP/25535/2017disposed of

Y.Venkataswamy, v. The District Revenue Officer

2017-09-22Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.09.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.25535 of 2017 Y.Venkataswamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri.

2.The Sub Collector, Hosur.

3.The Tahsildar, Soolagiri Taluk Office, Soolagiri, Krishnagiri District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to rectify the errors crept in the revenue records in respect of land to an extent of 1.25 acres in Survey No.1064/8 of Thiyarandurgam Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue computerised patta and chitta to the petitioner within a time frame based on the representation dated 29.08.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Era Premnath, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Mr.Era Premnath, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2.The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to rectify the errors crept in the revenue records in respect of land to an extent of 1.25 acres in Survey No.1064/8 of Thiyarandurgam Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District and issue computerised patta and chitta to the petitioner within a time frame based on the representation dated 29.08.2017.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

dated 29.08.2017, the 2nd respondent has not passed any order so far.

4.Mr.Era Premnath, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.08.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks.

5.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.08.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- ASST. REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ SUB ASST. REGISTRAR To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri.

2.The Sub Collector, Hosur.

3.The Tahsildar, Soolagiri Taluk Office, Soolagiri, Krishnagiri District.

+1 CC to the Government Pleader in SR.No.7015 +1 CC to M/S. R.BHARATHKUMAR, Adovcate in SR.NO.70538 W.P.No.25535 of 2017 SS(CO) VC (11/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/