Pandian v. Rabikul Tharja

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 31.03.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Second Appeal No.168 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Pandian ...Appellant (1st Defendant) - Vs -

1. Rabikul Tharja

2. Abbas

3. Mohammed Saddique

4. Mohammed Anwar

5. Missa Hunnisa

6. S.Zeenath Unnisa

7. Rabiyat Kudbuthin

...Respondents/Plaintiffs

(Defendants 2 to 6) Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 18.07.2014, made in A.S.No.47 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 01.08.2013, made in O.S.No.40 of 2005 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Sirkali.

For Appellant : Mr.A.Muthukumar

J U D G M E N T

When this matter was taken up, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that he does not press the second appeal as the matter is settled between the parties and he has also https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

made an endorsement to that effect. Hence, the second appeal stands dismissed as not pressed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kk To

1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.

2. The District Munsif, Sirkali.

1 CC to Mr.A.Muthukumar, Advocate SR.No. 18443 S.A.No.168 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 CNR (CO) PSI (21.04.2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/