Priya v. Inspcetor Of Police

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 354, 323 and 506(1) of IPC in Crime No.69 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner/A4 along with her husband and brother-in-laws abused the defacto complainant in a filthy language and threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would submit that there is a civil dispute between the petitioner's family and relative of defacto complainant. In order to overcome the civil dispute, a false complaint has been lodged against them. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submit that petitioner and her family members abused the defacto complainant and her son in a filthy language and also threatened her. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Sirkazhi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the

petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

nr [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

24.04.2024 nr Crl.O.P.No.9922 of 2024