← Library
Madras High CourtWP/13355/2025disposed of

E.Kannabiran v. The District Collector

2025-04-17Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY E.Kannabiran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector Tiruallur Tiruvallur District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District.

3.The Tahsildar Poonamallee Taluk Office Poonamallee Tiruvallur District.

4.The Tahsildar Avadi Taluk Office Tiruvallur District.

...Respondents

1/6

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 4 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2025 and consequently issue a fresh legal-heirship certificate by including the petitioner and his sisters names.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General-VIII Assisted by Dr.S.Suriya Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed with the prayer directing the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2025 and to issue a fresh legal heirship certificate by including the name of the petitioner also.

2/6

2. Upon hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition and perusing the material records of the case, the grievance of the petitioner is that one Elumalai died on 28.09.2004. He was married to two women and the petitioner is born through the second wife namely Yeshoda. Eventhough, legal heirship certificate is issued on 03.09.2010 the petitioner's name is missing in the said legal heirship certificate. The petitioner therefore has made the above representation.

3. The learned Additional Advocate General would submit that even if the original particulars if that are given is wrong as per the Government Order, the authorities have a right to correct the same.

4. It is also seems that there is bifurcation of Taluk. In any event, the Revenue Divisional Officer is the appellate authority.

5. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is disposed of on the following terms:

3/6

(i) The second respondent shall take up the representation made by the petitioner 06.01.2025 for consideration, it can be seen that even the children born through the second wife also are entitled to be mentioned as legal heirs and therefore, the same shall be considered by the second respondent;

(ii) The second respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as the other legal heirs mentioned in the legal heirship certificate dated 03.09.2010 and if the second respondent finds that the petitioner is also the son of the said Elumalai his name shall also be included and a fresh legal heirship certificate be ordered to be issued; (iii) The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the web copy of the order, without waiting for the certified copy of the order;

(iv) No costs.

17.04.2025 dna 4/6

To 1.The District Collector Tiruallur Tiruvallur District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvallur Tiruvallur District.

3.The Tahsildar Poonamallee Taluk Office Poonamallee Tiruvallur District.

4.The Tahsildar Avadi Taluk Office Tiruvallur District.

5/6

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J.

dna 17.04.2025 6/6