Madras High CourtCRL OP/12182/2022dismissed

Rahamunisha@Nisha v. The State Rep By

2022-05-19Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Nineteenth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.12182 of 2022 RAHAMUNISHA @ NISHA [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K8, ARUMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.P.GOVINDARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.DAMODARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor For Intervener : MR.MOHAMED RIYAS, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.Not known of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to money dispute the petitioner and defacto complainant had a quarrel between them. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the case has been registered in FIR No. 208 of 2022 under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) of IPC and if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, there is a possibility that she will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Mr.Mohamed Riyas, learned counsel for the Intervener submitted that there is a serious offence as against the petitioner and hence he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 19/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K8, ARUMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to MR.MOHAMED RIYAS Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.7452 CRL OP.12182/2022 Date :19/05/2022 CSK 25/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/