← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2766/2011dismissed as infructuous

C.Vijayakumari v. The District Collector

2017-02-08Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.02.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.2766 of 2011 1.C.Vijayakumari

2. P.Singaram

3. Venkateswari

4. Senthilkumar

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

3. The Tahsildar, Thittakudi, Cuddalore District.

.. Respondents Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarifed Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in Na.Ka.V2.5503-2010 dated 13.04.2010 and subsequent rejection order passed by the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.V2-5503-2010 dated 13.07.2010 and quash the same and further directing the respondents to allot the land which is in the possession of the petitioners and issue the patta in favour of the petitioners as per the G.O.854 dated 30.12.2006 within a reasonable time. For Petitioner: M/s.S.Sivakumar For Respondents: Mr.P.Chinna Durai, GA https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made an endorsement that the prayer in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

3. The Tahsildar, Thittakudi, Cuddalore District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.8282 ss(CO) md(23/02/2017) W.P.No.2766 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/