Subashini v. The State Rep. By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.04.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 10198 of 2025 Subashini Petitioner/A1 Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, PEW Mayiladuthurai Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.
(Crime No.23 of 2025) Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 23 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police.
For petitioner :
M/s. Shriharan R For Respondent :
Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(B) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024 in Crime No.23 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/6
2.
The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused were found illegally selling 30 bottles of pondy arrack, each containing 180 ml.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent; that she has been falsely implicated in this case; that the second accused was arrested and released on bail; that the petitioner is implicated on the confession of the co-accused and in any case, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required and sought anticipatory bail.
4.
The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the contraband were seized.
5.
Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations, the fact that the contraband has been seized, that the petitioner is implicated on the confession of the co-accused; the coaccused was arrested and released on bail and since, custodial 2/6
interrogation is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the District Munsif cum Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10:30 a.m., until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with 3/6
evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
.
07.04.2025 vca To:
4/6
1.
The PEW Mayiladuthurai Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.
2.
The District Munsif cum Magistrate Court, Tharangambadi.
3.
The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
5/6
vca CRL OP NO. 10198 of 2025 07.04.2025 6/6