M.S.Niranjhan v. State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.10988 of 2021 M.S.Niranjhan ... Petitioner Vs.

State By ... Respondent Inspector of Police, E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.

Crime No.833 of 2021.

Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.833 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Arthi For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of Indian Penal Code in Cr.No.833 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioner along with the other accused is alleged to have slapped the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that he has been falsely implicated in the case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that there is no injury.

5.Considering the fact that there is no injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned XVIII MM Judicial Magistrate, Saidapet, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 28/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.XVIII, SAIDAPET.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-1, MYLAPORE POLICE STATION, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI - 600 004.

+1 CC to M/S.S.P.ARTHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.6884 CRL OP.10988/2021 Date :28/06/2021 TA-09/07/2021