← Library
Madras High CourtWP/15607/2017disposed of

K.Krishnaveni v. The Director Of Town Panchayat

2017-08-21Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.08.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.15607 of 2017 K.Krishnaveni ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Director of Town Panchayats, Kuralagam, Chennai 104.

2. The Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Coimbatore.18

3. The Executive Officer, Chettipalayam Town Panchayat,

4. The Assisstant Divisional Engineer, (Construction & Maintenance) Highways Dept., South Sub Division 7, Coimbatore 641 018.

5. The Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam, ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representations of the petitioner dated 20.05.2017 as per law in light of directions passed by this Court in W.P.34913 of 2015 by its orders dated 05.11.2015 which was followed by the Judgment of this Court in W.P.No.18262 of 2015 vide its order dated 04.03.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajendiran For Respondents: Mr.S.Diwakar, SGP (R1,2,4&5) Mr.P.V.Selvakumr, AGP (R3)

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Diwakar, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1, 2 4 and 5 and Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader for the 3rd respondent.

2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 5 to consider and pass appropriate orders on her representation dated 20.05.2017, in accordance with law, in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P.34913 of 2015 dated 05.11.2015 and W.P.No.18262 of 2015 dated 04.03.2016.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the petitioner's representation dated 20.05.2017, the 3rd respondent has not passed any order so far.

4. Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 3rd respondent submitted that the 3rd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders, in accordance with law.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.05.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rg To

1. The Director of Town Panchayats, Kuralagam, Chennai 104.

2. The Assistant Director of Town Panchayats, Coimbatore.

3. The Executive Officer, Chettipalayam Town Panchayat,

4. The Assisstant Divisional Engineer, (Construction & Maintenance) Highways Dept., South Sub Division 7, Coimbatore 641 018.

5. The Inspector of Police, Chettipalayam, +1cc to Mr.A.Rajendiran, Advocate, S.R.No.60481 W.P.No.15607 of 2017 GN(04/09/2017)