← Library
Madras High CourtWP/23180/2015disposed of

Madanagiri, v. Government Of Tamil Nadu

2015-07-31Honourable Mr Justice D. Hariparanthaman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.07.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D. HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.23180 of 2015 Madanagiri .. Petitioner vs.

1. Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Forest and Environment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Head of Forest Force, No.1, Jeenis Road, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

3. The District Forest Officer, Hosur Forest Division, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Accountant General of Tamilnadu, Office of the Accountant General, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

.. Respondents * * * PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to count half of the services rendered by the petitioner as Plot Watcher from 01.06.1984 to till 06.08.2009 along with regular service rendered by the petitioner as Plot Watcher in the supernumerary post from 07.08.2009 to 30.04.2010 as qualifying service for pension benefits and send the proposal to the fourth respondent for grant of pension with all and consequential monetary benefits. * * * For Petitioner :

Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents :

Mr.N.Inbanathan, Govt. Advocate (Forests) for RR 1 to 3 Mr.V.Vijayashankar for R4

O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. According to the petitioner, he served as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis from 01.06.1984 to 06.08.2009. Subsequently, he was regularised as Plot Watcher (Supernumerary post) on 07.08.2009. He retired from service on 30.04.2010.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that 50% of the services rendered by him prior to regularisation is not taken into account for the purpose of pension and other benefits as per Rule 11

(2) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules. The petitioner has relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.27 and 28 of 2012 dated 13.02.2012 (Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government Vs. M.Gopal), which was confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP Nos.14838-14839 of 2012 on 10.05.2012. The Government implemented the same in G.O.Ms.No.183, Environment and Forests (FR-2) Department, dated 18.07.2012. Further, I have also passed an order in detail to count 50% of service rendered before regularisation in the case of P.Chinniyan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, reported in (2014) 6 MLJ 316.

4. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to count 50% of service rendered by the petitioner before regularization along with the service rendered after regularization for the purpose of pension and other terminal benefits in the light of Rule 11(2) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules and also the judgments referred to above and submit proposal for the terminal benefits for authorization before the fourth respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the fourth respondent is directed to authorize the same within a period of two weeks thereafter. No costs. gg s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrargg To

1. The Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Head of Forest Force, No.1, Jeenis Road, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

3. The District Forest Officer, Hosur Forest Division, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

4. The Accountant General of Tamilnadu, Office of the Accountant General, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

+ 1 cc to Mr.M.R.Jothimanian, Advocate SR 39290 tej(co) prk11/9 W.P.No.23180 of 2015