← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/12365/2022granted

R.Sakthivel v. The State Rep By

2022-05-26Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Sixth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.12365 of 2022 1 R.SAKTHIVEL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 R.PACHAIYAPPAN 3 K.RAMALINGAM 4 K.NITHIYANANTHAM 5 N.MANIKANDAN 6 M.SATHYA 7 KUMARI Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT CRIME NO.201 OF 2022 For Petitioner : M/S.S.B.VISWANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.R.S.NIRANJAN, Public Prosecutor for MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.201 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him with iron rod and stone. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the defacto complainant attacked the petitioners for which the 1st petitioner lodged a complaint in Crime No.202 of 2022 as against the defacto complainant. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod. He would further submit that it is a case in counter and the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the victim discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Thiruvannamali District, on condition that the petitioners shall each execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 26/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POLUR, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.S.B.VISWANATHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.12365/2022 Date :26/05/2022 RW-01/06/2022