Madras High CourtWP/23389/2018disposed of

S.Kanagavalli v. The Tamil Nadu State Marketing

2018-09-07Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.09.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.23389 of 2018 S.Kanagavalli ..Petitioner Vs The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) Rep. by its District Manager Thirumazhisai Unit III Sembarambakkam Chennai-600 123.

..Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to forthwith implement the order of the District Collector dated 21.08.2018 in Na.Ka.16372/2018/V.1 and the consequential order of the respondent dated 24.08.2018 in Na.Ka.No.4186/A6/18.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent :

Mr.P.Arumugarajan, Standing counsel

O R D E R

Mr.P.Arumugarajan, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. The writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the respondent to implement the directions issued by the District Collector dated 21.08.2018, wherein and whereby, the respondent was directed to locate the Tasmac Shop No.4186, at Door No.63, S.No.200/5, Thiruneermalai Main Road, Pammal, Pallavaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

3. Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The petitioner is a landlord of the subject matter premises. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent, having taken the said premises on lease from the petitioner for locating the Tasmac Shop No.4186, has not located the same so far, nor they paid the rent to the petitioner as well. It is the case of the petitioner that the District Collector, Kancheepuram District, has already directed the respondent to locate the said shop in the said premises through the proceedings dated 21.08.2018. As the shop is not located so far, the petitioner has approached this Court and filed the present writ petition.

5. Learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent, based on instructions, submitted that the subject matter shop will be located in the said premises within a period of four weeks and therefore, the petitioner need not have any apprehension. Therefore, he submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of, by recording the above said submission.

6. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances and considering the submission made on behalf of the respondent as stated supra, this writ petition is disposed of, by recording the above said submission. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mk To The District Manager The Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) Thirumazhisai Unit III Sembarambakkam Chennai-600 123.

+1cc to Mr.K.Selvaraj, Advocate Sr.62195 +1cc to Mr.P.Arumugarajan, Advocate Sr.61972 W.P.No.23389 of 2018 gjii[co] srg 25/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/