Manikam v. Lalitha

C.M.P.No.9952 of 2023 in C.M.A.SR.No.55737 of 2023 N.MALA,J, This petition is filed to condone the delay of 309 days in filing the above C.M.A.SR.No.55737 of 2023.

2. Service of Court notice to the respondents 1 to 4 is awaited. Private notice to the respondents 1 to 4 is served and none appears for them before this Court.

3. Notice sent to the 6th respondent has been returned with an endorsement as 'left'. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement that notice to the 6th respondent may be dispensed with as the 6th respondent remained exparte before the Tribunal. Hence, notice to the 6th respondent is dispensed with in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the petition.

4. Mr.U.Gokulakrishnan, learned counsel appears for the 5th respondent.

5. I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of this petition and I am satisfied with the reasons stated therein, therefore, the delay of 309 days is condoned and this petition is accordingly ordered.

27.06.2023 kj https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis