S.Subramanian v. The District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudachalam, Cuddalore District.

3.The Thasildhar, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District.

4.S.Subramanian ... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to furnish the enquiry report pertaining to the representation given by the petitioner dated 28.07.2015 within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : M/s.A.Anusuya For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan for R1 to R3 Additional Government Pleader R4 - Tapal Return Deceased 1/3

O R D E R

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that during the pendancy of this writ petition, the petitioner passed away and no legal representative of the petitioner came forward to represent the estate of the petitioner. 2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as abated. No costs.

02.11.2022 pri Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudachalam, Cuddalore District.

3.The Thasildhar, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District.

2/3

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri 02.11.2022 3/3