Moventhan @ Vijai v. The State Rep By Its The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Tenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.12629 of 2022 MOVENTHAN @ VIJAI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GENGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.134/2022) For Petitioner : M/S.M.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.DAMODARAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294 (b), and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.134 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that on 06.05.2022, at about 10.00 p.m., while the defacto complainant was in Medical shop, the petitioner and two other persons waylaided the defacto complainant and attacked him with iron rod and thereby he sustained injury. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner and two others attacked the defacto complainant with iron rod and caused injury. He further submit that the petitioner has four previous cases which are similar in nature. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and also considering that the petitioner has four previous cases similar in nature, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Therefore, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 10/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GENGAVALLI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.M.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.12629/2022 Date :10/06/2022 RW-22/06/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/