Manoharan v. State By Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.09.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM Criminal Appeal No.959 of 2007 Manoharan ... Appellant/Accused vs.

State by Inspector of Police Meensrutti Police Station Perambalur District Crime No.413 of 2005 ... Respondent Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Ariyalur, Perambalur District made in Sessions Case No.46/06 dated 12.12.2006.

For appellant :

No appearance For respondent :

Mr.P.Govindarajan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

There is no representation on the side of the appellant. Even in the earlier hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has not made his appearance and therefore, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed for default. Bail granted in favour of the appellant is cancelled. The trial court is directed to take appropriate steps so as to imprison the appellant/accused in prison. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CO) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To :

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Jayamkondam.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.-do- thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, perambalur.

3.The Additional and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court), Ariyalur, Perambalur District 4.The Superintendant Central Prison, Trichy.

5.The Inspector of Police Meensrutti Police Station Perambalur District Crime No.413 of 2005 6.The Public Prosecutor , High court, Madras Crl.A.No.959 of 2007 tej[co] srg 6.10.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/