← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11821/2020dismissed as infructuous

Nagamani v. The Director Of Rural Development And Panchayat Raj,

2024-09-12Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.09.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.M.P.No.14532 of 2020 G.Nagamani

...Petitioner

-Vs1. The Director of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

2. The District Collector cum District Rural Development Agency, Krishangiri District, Krishnagiri.

3. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Krishangiri District, Krishnagiri.

4. The Assistant Director of Panchayats, Krishnagir.

5. The Block Development Officer, Kaveripattinam Panchayat Union, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 to 5

from processing, conducting or finalizing any tender in any for relating to any works including the work of upgradation of a road at Bannihalli village panchayat, Kaveripattinam Panchayat Union, Krishangiri District as proposed by the fifth respondent unilaterally by utilizing the available funds from and out of Fourteenth Financial Commission (FFC) without any resolution of the panchayat.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Government Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for direction forbearing the respondents 2 to 5 from processing, conducting or finalizing any tender in any for relating to any works including the work of upgradation of a road at Bannihalli village panchayat, Kaveripattinam Panchayat Union, Krishangiri District as proposed by the fifth respondent unilaterally by utilizing the available funds from and out of Fourteenth Financial Commission (FFC) without any resolution of the panchayat. 2.

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted the prayer sought for in

this writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survive in this petition.

3.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous pettion is closed. There shall be no orders as to costs.

12.09.2024 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rts To

1. The Director of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

2. The District Collector cum District Rural Development Agency, Krishangiri District, Krishnagiri.

3. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Krishangiri District, Krishnagiri.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

rts

4. The Assistant Director of Panchayats, Krishnagir.

5. The Block Development Officer, Kaveripattinam Panchayat Union, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri District.

W.M.P.No.14532 of 2020 12.09.2024