← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/13107/2020disposed of

K.Parimala v. The Superiendent Of Police

2020-08-27Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P.No. 13107 of 2020 K.Parimala, W/o.Kanniyappan, No.20, R.S.Road, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ponneri Taluk, Ponneri -601 204.

3.The Inspector of Police, Ponneri Police Station, Ponneri, Tiruvallur District.

4. Sekar S/o. Not known No.15 C Lakshmi Amman Kovil, 1st Street Thirvayarpaadi, Ponneri.

5. S.Jagan S/o. Sekar, No.15 C Lakshmi Amman Kovil, 1st street Thirvayarpaadi, Ponneri.

6.Udhayakumar Working as Sub-Inspector of Police, Ponneri Police Station, Tiruvallur District

7.Mahalingam, Working as Sub-Inspector of Police, Ponneri Police Station, Tiruvallur District 8.Simon Working as Sub-Inspector of Police, Ponneri Police Station, Tiruvallur District ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to issue direction, directing the 1 to 3rd respondents to provide the necessary police protection to the petitioners family members against the 4th to 8th respondents based on his representation dated 12.08.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Kartheeban For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

O R D E R

This petition has been filed for a direction directing the respondents one to three to provide necessary police protection to the petitioners family members against the respondents four to eight, based on her representation dated 12.08.2020. 2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents one to three would submit that, on receipt of the complaint given by the petitioner, C.S.R has been issued and the same was closed.

3.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondents six to eight are police personnels, who are working in the third respondent police station and they are at trouble with the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner sought for police protection. He further submitted that even then, without conducting any enquiry, the complaint was simply closed by the fourth respondent.

4.Considering the above submissions, the petitioner is directed to lodge a fresh complaint to the second respondent herein and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to conduct enquiry, after issuing notice to the respondents four to eight herein and pass appropriate orders on merits in accordance with law.

5.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS I) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsn To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ponneri Taluk, Ponneri -601 204.

3.The Inspector of Police, Ponneri Police Station, Ponneri, Tiruvallur District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to M/s.T.V.G.Kartheeban, Advocate Sr.No. 27929 CRL.O.P.No. 13107 of 2020 SV(CO) RMP(19/10/2020)