C.Rangaraj v. The State Rep By Its The Inspector Of Police, Venganur Police Station,Ariyalur District

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) , 323 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.30 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a matrimonial dispute between the first petitioner's daughter one Deepika/wife and the defacto complainant/husband, due to which, there was wordy quarrel between them. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against them for statistical purpose. He further submitted that due to matrimonial dispute, the 1st petitioner's daughter one Deepika had filed a divorce petition in H.M.O.P.No.174 of 2022, for which, the defacto complainant had threatened the petitioners to withdraw the divorce case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory

bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that due to matrimonial dispute between the defacto complainant and his wife, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. He further submitted that it is a case and a case in counter. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the

learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ariyalur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate shall obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the first petitioner shall report before the respondent police once in a week at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the second and third petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.,

nti/nr [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

17.05.2023 nti/nr