Mrs.S.A.Zainab Sulaiha v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.01.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.26493 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 S.A.Zainab Sulaiha

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings, Chennai.

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Zone-24, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai.

3. Assistant Engineer, Division 111, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai .. Respondents Prayers: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from blocking the ingress and egress on the southern side of the petitioner's property situated at New Door No.9, Old Door No.28/29, Khader Nawaz Khan Road, Chennai by putting up construction on the foot path in the facts and circumstances of the case.

For Petitioner : M/s.P.Solomon Francis For Respondents : Mr.R. Arunmozhi Government Advocate

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as Infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpl To

1. The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings, Chennai.

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Zone-24, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai.

3. Assistant Engineer, Division 111, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.A.ARUNMOZHI, Advocate, S.R.No. 5394 W.P.No.26493 of 2014 BR(CO) TR(14/02/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/