Madras High CourtCRL OP/21906/2018disposed of

R.Srinivasan, M/A 38 Years, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2018-09-11Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM Crl.O.P.No.21906 of 2018 R.Srinivasan ... Petitioner/1st accused Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Sub-Inspector of Police, V-3, J.J.Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

2.Soundarajan ... Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings of C.C.No.226 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambathur. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja For R1 : Ms.M.Prabhavathi, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original petition has been filed to quash the proceedings of C.C.No.226 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambathur as against the petitioner/first accused.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.

3.The petitioner is the first accused in C.C.No.226 of 2016. The second respondent in the petition is the defacto complainant in the above said C.C. number. The C.C.No.226 of 2016 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294 (b), 323, 448, 427, 506 (i) r/w 34 IPC on the file of the first respondent police.

4. It appears that at the advise of the elders and friends, the petitioner and the second respondent have agreed to compromise the matter, out of Court. A Joint Compromise Memo is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

also filed to that effect. The petitioner and the second respondent appeared before this Court and expressed in unequivocal terms that they have compromised the matter and signed in the Joint Compromise Memo on their own will and volition. The identities of the parties are verified with reference to the authenticated documents produced by the parties before this Court. The identities of the parties are also confirmed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor through the first respondent police.

5. Having regard to the Compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, the C.C.No.226 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambathur is quashed as against the petitioner alone.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ggi To

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambathur

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, V-3, J.J.Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc Mr.Sesubalan Raja, Advocate, SR.No. 63537 Crl.O.P.No.21906 of 2018 CSL/25.10.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/