R.Srinivasan, M/38 Years, v. State Of Tamilnadu, Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM Crl.O.P.No.21907 of 2018 R.Srinivasan ..Petitioner/1st accused Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Sub-Inspector of Police, V-3 J.J Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

2.S.Subashree ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records and quash the Crime No.444 of 2016 on the file of the V-3, J.J. Nagar Police Station, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja For R1 : Ms.M.Prabhavathi, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original petition has been filed to call for the records and quash the FIR in Crime No.444 of 2016 on the file of the V-3, J.J. Nagar Police Station, Chennai as against the petitioner/first accused.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.

3.The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.444 of 2016. The second respondent in the petition is the defacto complainant in the above said crime number. The FIR in Crime No.444 of 2016 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 506(i) IPC r/w 4 of TNPHW Act, on the file of the first respondent police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. It appears that at the advise of the elders and friends, the petitioner and the second respondent have agreed to compromise the matter, out of Court. A Joint Compromise Memo is also filed to that effect. The petitioner and the second respondent appeared before this Court and expressed in unequivocal terms that they have compromised the matter and signed in the Joint Compromise Memo on their own will and volition. The identities of the parties are verified with reference to the authenticated documents produced by the parties before this Court. The identities of the parties are also confirmed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor through the first respondent police.

5.Having regard to the compromise arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending. Hence, the FIR in Cr.No.444 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent is quashed as against the petitioner alone.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ggi/gv To 1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, State of Tamil Nadu V-3 J.J Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja, Advocate, SR.No.63536 Crl.O.P.No.21907 of 2018 CSL/25.10.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/