Yemiliamma, v. Corporation Of Chennai,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.03.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Writ Petition No.7345 of 2013 Yemiliamma

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. Corporation of Chennai, Rep. By its Commissioner, Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003.

2. Corporation of Chennai Zone - V, Rep. By its Zonal Officer, Mulagothiram, Chennai - 600 079.

3. Employees Provident Fund Office, Rep. By its Commissioner, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014. ...Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to attest the F/10D forms and forward to the third respondent and direct the third respondent to sanction the arrears of family pension to the petitioner with 18% interest to the petitioner from 08.02.1984.

For Petitioner : Mr.Beulah John Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr.A.Nagarajan for R1 and R2 Mr.K.Ramu for R3

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Corporation of Chennai to attest Form 10D and forward to the third respondent for the purpose of sanctioning family pension.

2. When the writ petition came up for hearing on 26.02.2015, I have directed the Chennai Corporation to attest the Form in question and forward it to the third respondent.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned Standing Counsel for the Chennai Corporation produced a copy of the attested Form and submitted that it has already been sent to the third respondent for passing appropriate orders.

4. The third respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the proposal made in Form 10D as expeditiously as possible and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

in any case within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner wanted the Chennai Corporation to pay interest on account of delay. It is open to the petitioner to submit appropriate representation to the first respondent claiming interest. In case any such representation is given, the same shall be considered and disposed by the first respondent on merits and taking into account the period of delay.

6. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. Sd/- Assistant Registrar Dated:16.3.15 True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. Corporation of Chennai, Rep. By its Commissioner, Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003.

2. Corporation of Chennai Zone - V, Rep. By is Zonal Officer, Mulagothiram, Chennai - 600 079.

3. Employees Provident Fund Office, Rep. By its Commissioner, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014.

+1 cc to N.Beulah John selvaraj, Advocate,sR.11912 +1cc to Mr.K.Ramu, advocate,sr.11957 +1 cc to Mr.A.Nagarajan, Advocate,SR.11917.

ctk(co) krd 18/3 W.P.No.7345 of 2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/