S.Vijayakumari v. V.Palanimuthu,S/O.Veerasamy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.07.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN CRL.A.No.1465 of 2003 S.Vijayakumari ...Appellant/Complainant -VsV.Palanimuthu
...Respondent/Accused
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment acquitting the respondent/accused by the learned XXIII-Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai in C.C.No.2924/1997 vide judgement dated 28.07.2003 to call for the records and set aside the same.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for hearing on 23.06.2018 in the Special Sitting, there was no representation for the appellant and this Court directed the Registry to post this matter on 27.06.2018 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2. Since the case was not heard on 27.06.2018 through video conferencing, Registry listed this matter today for hearing through video conference.
3. Even today (02.07.2018), there was no representation for the appellant as well as for the respondent. Therefore, it could be inferred that the parties are not interested in prosecuting https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the case and it is also seen that the appeal is of the year 2003, which is pending for more than 15 years without any quietus. Hence, this Court is of the view that the Criminal Appeal is liable to be dismissed for default and accordingly, the same is dismissed for default.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar das To 1.The XXIII-Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Madras.
3.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras-104.
CRL.A.No.1465 of 2003 sj[co] srg 20/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/