Sabari Vinoth v. B.Sekhar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:29.04.2024 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and Crl.M.P.No.7049 of 2024 Sabari Vinoth .. Petitioner /versus/ B.Sekar .. Respondent Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 02.03.2024 made in Crl.M.P.No.1263 of 2024 in S.T.C.No.974 of 2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Palladam.

For Petitioner :Mr.N.Manoj Kumara

ORDER

The petitioner herein, who is the complainant had initiated prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. When the matter was listed for judgment, the petitioner has taken out a petition to recall himself and mark certain documents. He 1/3

being the complainant should have vigilant in letting evidence in favour of the complainant, instead of, at the fag end, he has filed the petition to reopen and recall and also adduce further evidence by marking certain documents like, account statement and SMS conversation. The trial Court, after considering the merits of the petition, has dismissed it. Being aggrieved, the present petition is filed.

2.

On perusing the records and hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court finds no reason to entertain this petition challenging the well considered order of the trial Court dismissing the application to reopen and recall. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

29.04.2024 Index:yes/no ari To:

The Judicial Magistrate, Palladam.

2/3

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

ari and Crl.M.P.No.7049 of 2024 29.04.2024 3/3