← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18505/2016disposed of

K.Krishnan, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2016-05-26Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.05.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.18505 of 2016 K.Krishnan .. Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police, Papparapatti Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

.. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent authority to give permission to conduct the cultural program at Makkanur Arulmighu Sri Periyandavar and Periyandichi Koil Thiruvizha on 28.05.2016 at Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.05.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja For Respondent : Ms.P.Rajalakshmi Government Advocate

O R D E R

By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner claims to be the Head of the Organizing Committee of Makkanur Arulmighu Sri Periyandavar and Periyandichi Koil and he intends to conduct cultural program in connection with the temple festival on 28.05.2016 at Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District and in this regard, submitted a representation to the respondent on 23.05.2016. Since no order has been passed, the petitioner has come forward to file this writ petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Heard the submissions of Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.P.Rajalakshmi, learned Government Advocate, who accepted notice on behalf of the respondent.

4. In the light of the above facts and circumstances and since the date for conducting the cultural program falls on 28.05.2016, this Court, in this writ petition cannot issue any direction. However, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a fresh representation to the respondent, well in advance for conducting the cultural program in connection with the Temple festival and on receipt of the same, the respondent is directed to consider and pass orders as expeditiously as possible, within a period of one week thereafter, in accordance with law and inform the decision taken, to the petitioner.

5. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Inspector of Police, Papparapatti Police Station, Dharmapuri District.

W.P.No.18505 of 2016 rsk[co] srg 31/05/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/