← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/9436/2023disposed of

K.Sengotuvel v. State Rep By

2023-04-27Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.04.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No.9436 of 2023 K.Sengotuvel ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State Rep by, The Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Namakkal. ... Respondents PRAYER : This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd Respondent herein not to harass the Petitioner herein under the guise of Investigation.

For Petitioner : M/s.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate(Crl.side) 1/6

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent herein not to harass the Petitioner herein under the guise of Investigation.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, based on the complaint given by one Chelladurai, petitioner is unnecessarily harassed by the 2nd respondent police. Therefore, present petition is filed.

3. In response, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that, Chelladurai gave a complaint against the petitioner in connection with the property dispute and after enquiry, petition enquiry was closed. Thereafter, petitioner gave a complaint against the Chelladurai. On the basis of this complaint, petition enquiry is pending.

4. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police has been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. 2/6

5. In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner may not be the same to the police officer.

6. In order to meet such situations, the following guidelines are issued: a)While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a summon/notice specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation. b) The respondent police is directed to serve summons mentioning the CSR number, date of complaint and the name of the complainant c)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station. 3/6

d)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation. e)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to. 7.

With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

27.04.2023 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order Sma 4/6

To

1. The State Rep by, The Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Namakkal.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

5/6

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.

Sma Crl.O.P.No.9436 of 2023 27.04.2023 6/6