V.Babu @ Anandaraj v. Arulmigu Siddhi Ganesar Nataraja Durgalakshmi Temple

C.M.P.No.11680 of 2020 in S.A.S.R.No.55006 of 2020 P.T.ASHA, J., It is informed that the 2nd respondent has sold the property to the 1st appellant and would therefore have no interest in the lis. Therefore, he seeks to have the notice dispensed with.

Accordingly, notice to the 2nd respondent is dispensed with.

2. Considering the fact that sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit filed in support of the petition for condoning the delay, the delay is condoned.

3. The Registry is directed to number the Second Appeal.

06.08.2021 kan 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/