S.Paul Julian v. The Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Paul Julian .. Petitioner Vs.
1.The Collector, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District 611011.
2.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600028.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.
4.The Sub Registrar, Tirupoondi, Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District 611 110.
5.M.Arokiasamy 6.P.Amalorpava Mary 7.Maria Cironmani 8.M.Rajamanikkam 9.Tamilarasi 10.N.Anbarasan 11.V.Manivannan 12.G.Gnanaprakasam
13.P.Amalorpava Mary 14.Yesuraj 15.S.Dhanabalan 16.S.Yesuraj 17.M.Arockiasamy 18.John Britto 19.J.Daisy Rani 20.Kingsley Jerold 21.Theresammal 22.A.Victoria 23.Kamali Sundaram 24.Sundaram 25.M.Arockia Samy 26.Thavamani 27.Methew Fernandas 28.P.Amalorpava Mary 29.Maria Sironmani 30.S.Dhanapalan 31.V.X.Chellappan 32.S.Mathalai Mary 33.B.Mala 34.A.Juliet Mary 35.P.Arockia Doss .. Respondents (R5 to 35 are impleaded vide order dated 01.06.2017 in WMP.No.35343/2016) Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying of issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 2 and 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.02.2016 in the light of the Circular in Circular No.67 dated 03-11-2011 in (C.No. 52338/C1/2011) issued by the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai-600 028, the first respondent herein and pass suitable orders within the time frame as may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Francis Edmund For RR1 to 4 : Mr.E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this petition for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.02.2016 in the light of the Circular in Circular No.67 dated 03-11-2011
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present writ petition is filed to consider the representation of the petitioner in the light of the Circular in Circular No.67 dated 03-11-2011. It is further submitted that the said circular itself was withdrawn on 20.10.2017 by the Inspector General of Registration and therefore all the subsequent proceedings based on the said circular has no force and prays for liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application either in terms of Section 77A or 68(2) of the Registration Act.
3. In view of the limited request sought for by the petitioner and further considering the facts and circumstances of the case that the Circular No.67, dated 03.01.2011, based on which representation was given by the petitioner, itself was withdrawn on 20.10.2017, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However liberty is granted to the petitioner to workout the remedy in the manner known to law . No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
07.11.2022 sk To 1.The Collector, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District 611011.
2.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai 600028.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.
4.The Sub Registrar, Tirupoondi,
Nagapattinam Taluk, Nagapattinam District 611 110.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
Sk
07.11.2022