Vinothkumar, v. The Bar Council Of Tamil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN W.P.NO.24190 OF 2015 Vinothkumar .. Petitioner VS.

The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry Represented by its Secretary High Court Buildings Chennai - 600 104.

.. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in ROC No.856/2014 dated 13.03.2014 and quash the same and further direct the respondent to include the petitioner candidature for enrollment as an Advocate on the role of respondent forthwith or any other subsequent date. (Prayer amended as per order dated 01.09.2015 in M.P.No.1/2015 in W.P.No.24190/2015) For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Thirugnanam No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.S.Y.Masood

O R D E R

(ORDER OF THE COURT WAS MADE BY N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.) When the matter came up for hearing on 05.06.2018, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed after one week. Again when the matter came up for hearing on 12.06.2018, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner along with the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner with address and the matter was directed to be listed on 19.06.2018. Subsequently, when the matter was listed on 19.06.2018, there was no representation on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today (25.06.2018) under the caption "for dismissal" with the name of the petitioner as well as his counsel and address printed in the cause list. .

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, inspite of posting the matter under the caption "for dismissal", neither the counsel nor the petitioner appeared before this Court, even though their names have been printed in the cause list along with address. It is evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar TK To The Secretary The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry High Court Buildings Chennai - 600 104.

W.P.NO.24190 OF 2015 GMR(CO) TR(06/07/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/