Reddy B.M @ B. Muthukrishna @ B.Muthuvel v. The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirteenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.12997 of 2022 REDDY B.M @ B. MUTHUKRISHNA @ B.MUTHUVEL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, TEAM I, EDF-1, CHENNAI.

(CRIME NO.6 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.K.RAJASEKARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.DAMODARAN, Additional public Prosecutor For Intervenor : M/S.A.MADHUMATHI Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420 and 120B of IPC in Crime No.6 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and his associates cheated the defacto complainant and received Rs5,46,00,000/- on false assurance of arranging loan of Rs.200 Crores. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned counsel for the Intervenor has raised strong objection by stating that the petitioner and his associates cheated the defacto complainant and received Rs5,46,00,000/- on false assurance of arranging loan of Rs.200 Crores.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner is having eight previous cases. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 13/06/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH, TEAM I, EDF-1, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.A.MADHUMATHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.9157 CRL OP.12997/2022 Date :13/06/2022 JPA 20/06/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/