Madras High CourtCRL OP/25902/2014dismissed as infructuous

S.Martin v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-09-07Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :07.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM Crl.OP.No.25902 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

1. S.Martin

2. SusaiManickam ... Petitioners Vs.

1. State rep by Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore.

(Crime No.160 of 2012)

2. V.K.Annapoorani ...Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, prayed to call for the entire records in Crime No.160 of 2012 dated 13.03.2012, on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same as illegal, time barred and abuse of process of law.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Murali For Respondents : T.Shunmuga Rejeswaran Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.R.Rajarajan for R2

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioners requested to grant some more time for arguments.

2. The learned counsel for the second respondent also requested to grant some more time for arguments.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) who is appearing for the first respondent has submitted that even on 29.11.2013 itself, the matter was referred to as " mistake of fact " and to that effect, a report has been also filed before the concerned Court.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is open to the second respondent/defacto complainant to avail any other remedy which is available under the law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition in M.P.No.1 of 2014 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Puducherry

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.OP.No.25902 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 KAN(CO) rrs 25/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/