Ms.Thara Abdul Rahman v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.02.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.O.P.No.25172 of 2015 MS.THARA ABDUL RAHMAN .. Petitioner

Versus

1 STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE T4 MADURAVOYAL POLICE STATION CHENNAI-600 095 (CR.NO.193/2013) 2 K.S.DHANALAKSHMI .. Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the FIR in Crime No.193 of 2013 pending on the file of the 1st respondent herein.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Shanmuganathan For Respondent-1 : Mr. C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent-2 : Mr.T.K.S.Gandhi

O R D E R

Today the petitioner / accused is present. The second respondent / defacto complainant is not present. But the affidavit filed by the second respondent, which was signed and identified by Vice Consul, Consulate General of India, Dubai (U.A.E.) on 21.01.2016 is produced before this Court by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the second respondent. 2.

The counsel appearing on behalf of the second respondent / defacto complainant would submit that the dispute is between landlord and tenant and the tenant is the accused and that the possession has been handed over and that the Civil Suit has also been compromised and therefore, his client has no objection to withdraw the First Information Report. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.

Recording the same, the First Information Report in Cr.No.193 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed.

4.

The Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE T4 MADURAVOYAL POLICE STATION CHENNAI-600 095.

2.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras Crl.O.P.No.25172 of 2015 vd(CO) srg(24/02/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/