Panjavarnam v. State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.11.2022 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN H.C.P.No.1000 of 2022 Panjavarnam W/o.Perumal ... Petitioner Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Police, The Greater Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.
3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066.
4.The Inspector of Police, T-15, S.R.M.C. Police Station, Chennai.
... Respondents 1/6
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order in Memo No.21/BCDFGISSSV/2022 dated 20.04.2022 passed by the second respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's son Sivakumar S/o.Perumal, aged about 21 years, the detenu, now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner :
Mr.Machavatharam for Mr.D.Gopikrishnan For Respondents :
Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor *****
O R D E R
[Made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.] The petitioner is the mother of the detenu, Sivakumar S/o.Perumal, aged about 21 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in No.21/BCDFGISSSV/2022 dated 20.04.2022, holding him to be a "Goonda", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.
2/6
2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that page No.203 in the booklet furnished to the detenu is illegible. Learned counsel further submits that the same adversely has affected the detenu's right of making an effective representation.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the Habeas Corpus Petition by filing his counter.
5. When the documents furnished to the detenu are illegible, opportunity of clear understanding and making effective representation in keeping with Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India on such understanding is lost and the detenu is deprived thereof. This would vitiate the order of detention. For the aforesaid reasons, this Court would allow the present petition.
3/6
In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in No.21/BCDFGISSSV/2022 dated 20.04.2022, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Sivakumar S/o.Perumal, aged about 21 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. [PNP, J.] [GCS, J.] 22.11.2022 Index: Yes/No gm To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Police, The Greater Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.
3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066.
4.The Inspector of Police, T-15, S.R.M.C. Police Station, Chennai.
4/6
5.The Joint Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Public, Law and Order Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.
6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
5/6
P.N.PRAKASH, J.
and G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.
gm H.C.P.No.1000 of 2022 22.11.2022 6/6