← Library
Madras High CourtWP/13391/2024withdrawn dismissed

Karan Sanklecha v. The District Collector

2024-06-14Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mrs Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.06.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI Karan Sanklecha S/o.Dhanpatraj ... petitioner Vs.

1.

The District Collector Thiruvallur District.

2.

The District Revenue Officer Thiruvallur District.

3.

The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvallur Division Thiruvallur District.

4.

The Thasildar Ambattur Taluk Thiruvallur District.

5.

The Inspector of Police Korattur Police Station Korattur, Chennai.

Page Nos.1/4

6.

Mettu Jeyasankar S/o.Ramachandraprasad 7.

Madanapalli Janardhana Rao S/o Venkatakrishna ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.08.2023 and remove the illegal compound wall constructed by 6th and 7th respondents at Annai Maria Nagar, Korattur Village, Ambattur Taluk, Thiruvallur District. For Petitioner :

Mr.C.Elamurugan For Respondents :

Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate for R1 to R5

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] After some arguments, Mr.C.Elamurugan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Writ Petition' {hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity} but made a plea to preserve rights of writ petitioner to either file a suit or pursue any other remedy available in law.

Page Nos.2/4

2. We find that the captioned WP is bereft of particulars that are imperative. Therefore, as a one-off case, making it clear that this will not serve as precedent, we preserve rights of writ petitioner to come up with another writ petition with better or clearer particulars or pursue a suit or any other other remedy available in law if so advised and so desired.

3. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP is disposed of as closed / withdrawn albeit preserving rights of writ petitioner in the aforementioned manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 14.06.2024 Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk Page Nos.3/4

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J., mk To 1.

The District Collector Thiruvallur District.

2.

The District Revenue Officer Thiruvallur District.

3.

The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvallur Division Thiruvallur District.

4.

The Thasildar Ambattur Taluk Thiruvallur District.

5.

The Inspector of Police Korattur Police Station Korattur, Chennai.

14.06.2024 Page Nos.4/4