← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6208/2004dismissed as infructuous

Majestic Enterprises v. The Deptuy Commercial Tax

2017-07-14Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.07.2017 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANDAPANI Writ Petition No.6208 OF 2004 Majestic Enterprises, 5-III-F, Anna Nagar Road, Kullasekaram, Kanyakumari ... Petitioner Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Enforcement-III, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent in G.D.No.1/2003-04 dated 29.02.2004, quash the same as not sustainable in law. For petitioner : Mr.Ravee Kumar For respondent : Mr.Kanmani Annamalai, Addl.G.P. for Tax

O R D E R

Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has already become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.

Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VI) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar tsi https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Enforcement-III, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.

W.P.No.6208 of 2004 sr(co) ss(4/8/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/