← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14923/2023disposed of

J.Alamelu v. The District Collector

2023-06-02Honourable Mr Justice G. Chandrasekharan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.06.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN and WMP.No.14513 of 2023 J.Alamelu

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Mayiladuthurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mayiladuthurai District.

3. The Tasildhar, Office of the Tasildhar, Tarangambadi, Mayiladuthurai District.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Porayar Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.

6. G.Durairaj

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of the Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to conduct the enquiry of the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2019 and 18.07.2019 and take necessary action against the one 6th respondent for excommunicating the petitioner and protect the petitioner's right and livelihood. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Jim Raj Milton For Respondents : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to conduct the enquiry of the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2019 and 18.07.2019 and take necessary action against the sixth respondent for excommunicating the petitioner and protect the petitioner's right and livelihood.

2. When the matter is taken up, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner's representations dated 08.01.2019 and 18.07.2019 were enquired and closed. However, that report is not available. He further submitted that if a fresh representation is given by the petitioner, appropriate action will be taken.

3. Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation narrating her grievances, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such submission of a fresh representation, the respondents 1 to 5 are directed to consider and pass appropriate orders, in the manner know to law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation.

4. With the above directions, this Writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 02.06.2023 mn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J.,

mn To

1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Mayiladuthurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mayiladuthurai District.

3. The Tasildhar, Office of the Tasildhar, Tarangambadi, Mayiladuthurai District.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Mayiladuthurai District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Porayar Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.

6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

02.06.2023