Lingaraj@Lingam v. State Rep By

Crl.MP.No.7131 of 2022 Crl.M.P.No.7131 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No. 12148 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

This petition has been filed to amend the satisfaction Court in the order dated 19.05.2022 passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No. 12148 of 2022.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in the anticipatory bail petition in Crl.O.P.No.12148 of 2022, the satisfaction Court has been wrongly mentioned and prayed that in the order dated 19.05.2022, the satisfaction Court may be mentioned as Judicial Magistrate, Palladam instead of Judicial Magistrate, Tiruppur.

3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Registry is directed to amend the satisfaction Court in order dated 19.05.2022 in Crl.O.P.No.12148 of 2022 as Judicial Magistrate, Palladam and issue order copy afresh. Time is extended till 20.06.2022 to the petitioner to comply with the conditions imposed in the order dated 19.05.2022 from the date on which this order copy made ready. 09.06.2022 dhk/cda https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.MP.No.7131 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

dhk/cda Crl.M.P.No.7131 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No. 12148 of 2022 09.06.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis