N. Subramanian v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.11.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.25408 of 2015 N.Subramanian ... Petitioner .Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore District Cuddalore

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Virudhachalam Range Virudhachalam Cuddalore District

3. The Inspector of Police Virudhachalam Town Police Station Virudhachalam Cuddalore District ... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 29.12.2014 and conduct fair and proper investigation.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The present petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 29.12.2014.

2. In the petition, it has been stated that the petitioner's father Narayanasamy owned lands in S.No.11/4A to an extent of 66 cents and in S.No.327/2 to an extent of 1 acre and 10 cents in Komangalam Village, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District . While so, the petitioner's father availed a hand loan of Rs.4,000/- from one Andiappan in 1997 and the petitioner's father died on 09.01.2011. After the death of petitioner's father, when the petitioner approached the said Andiappan to repay the loan, the said Andiappan informed the petitioner that the lands belong to him and the documents are created in his name. The petitioner submits that Andiappan created document by forging the signature of the petitioner and his father. Hence, the petitioner gave a complaint on 29.12.2014. Since, no action was taken on the said complaint, the present petition has been filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the very same set of allegation, the petitioner has filed a complaint before the Anti-land Grabbing Cell and after conducting enquiry, the complaint was closed. He would further submit that now suppressing the earlier complaint, the petitioner has filed the present complaint. He has also produced the closure report pertaining to the easier complaint.

5. On a perusal of the closure report it appears that the petitioner has suppressed the earlier complaint given to the Anti-land Grabbing Cell. Hence, this Court is not inclined to give any direction to the respondent. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gpa

To

1. The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore District Cuddalore

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Virudhachalam Range Virudhachalam Cuddalore District

3. The Inspector of Police Virudhachalam Town Police Station Virudhachalam Cuddalore District

4. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court Chennai +1cc to Mr.D.Ashok Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.61403 Crl.O.P.No.25408 of 2015 AR IV CA(24/11/2015)