Madras High CourtCRL OP/13584/2020dismissed

Prabakaran v. State Rep.By

2020-09-09Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.13584 of 2020 Prabakaran ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police Pernampet Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime. No. 613/2020) ... Respondent Prayer:

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.613 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vinodhkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 174 (3) of Cr.P.C @ 306 IPC in crime No.613 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that the defacto complainant's daughter got married one Prabakaran (A1) and there was a wordy quarrel between them. On 25.05.2020, the petitioner picked up a quarrel with the defacto complainant stating that she should not attend the function, as a result of which she committed suicide by hanging. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and the victim committed suicide due to quarrel and not due to demand of dowry. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the marriage had happened only two years prior to the occurrence and they got one child. He further submitted that the investigation is not yet completed and the RDO enquiry report is not yet filed. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case that the RDO enquiry is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 09/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUVALLUR.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERNAMPET POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. G.VINODHKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13584/2020 Date :09/09/2020 MK:23/09/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/