Karthik Subramaniam v. State Of Tamilnadu

C.M.P.Nos.11355 and 11358 of 2023 in W.A.Nos. SR 58271 and 58272 of 2023 C.M.P.Nos.11355 and 11358 of 2023 in W.A.Nos.58271 and 58272 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard Mr.S.Senthil, learned counsel for the applicants; Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents 1, 3 and 4 and, Mrs.C.Shyamala, learned counsel for the second respondent.

2. It is submitted that the original writ petitioner had died during the pendency of the writ petitions. As the legal heirship certificate could not be obtained, the factum of the death of the original writ petitioner was not intimated before the learned Single Judge during the pendency of the writ proceedings. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the present writ petitions were also decided along with a batch of writ petitions under a common judgment. The other appeals are also filed and are pending.

3. In the light of the above, we permit the change in the cause-title of the applicants only for the purpose of prosecuting the present appeals.

4. The applications are, accordingly, allowed and disposed of. (S.V.G., C.J.) (P.D.A., J.) 10.07.2023 bbr __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.Nos.11355 and 11358 of 2023 in W.A.Nos. SR 58271 and 58272 of 2023 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

bbr C.M.P.Nos.11355 and 11358 of 2023 in W.A.Nos. SR 58271 and 58272 of 2023 10.07.2023 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis