Madras High CourtSA/1583/2004dismissed for default

Suseela v. Lakshmi

2015-12-17Honourable Mr Justice S. Nagamuthu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.12.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Second Appeal No.1583 of 2004

1. Suseela

2. Sakthivel ... Appellants/Defendants Vs.

1. Lakshmi

2. Sumathi

3. Poongodi ... Respondents/Plaintiffs Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree dated 30.4.2004 made in A.S.No.11 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Attur, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.7.2001 made in O.S.No.312 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Attur.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Raghavachari

J U D G M E N T

Mr.T.R.Rajaraman, the learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo withdrawing his appearance. The appellants are also not before the Court today. Though the matter was listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, there is no https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

representation on behalf of the appellants. But, the respondent is ready. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, CMP No.12416 of 2004 is also dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kpl To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Attur.

2. The District Munsif, Attur.

Copy To The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1583 of 2004 SV(CO) CA(04/01/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/