Narayanan v. The State Rep. By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.11779 of 2021 Narayanan
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State rep, by The Inspector of Police, Paparapatti Police Station, Dharmapuri District.
(Crime No.353 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.353 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Selvam For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.353 of 2021,on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had stolen the cattle (white goat) from the house of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the stolen cattle has been recovered. He further submits that there is no previous case pending as against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the fact that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and the stolen cattle was recovered, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pennagaram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a) if the petitioner fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 08/07/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PENNAGARAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DHARMAPURI(FOR INFORMATION) 3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAPARAPATTI POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CC to M/S.M.SELVAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.7244 CRL OP.11779/2021 Date :08/07/2021 RVR 19/07/2021