Madras High CourtCRL RC/903/2009dismissed for default

A.Vasudevan v. Dhena @ Dinakaran

2016-06-15Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.R.C.No.903 of 2009 A.Vasudevan ... Petitioner/Defacto complainant Vs.

1. Dhena @ Dinakaran

2. Anand Amstrong ... Respondents 1 & 2/Accused

3. State by, The Inspector of Police, K-2, Ayanavaram Police Station, Chennai - 600 023.

K2 Police Station Cr.No.1070/2006. ... Respondent 3/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the order of acquittal passed against respondents 1 & 2/accused on 20.07.2009 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Chennai, in S.C.No.379 of 2008 for the offences under Sections 341, 307, 506(ii) r/w.34 IPC and allow this revision petition.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For RR-1 & 2 : Mr.L.Mahendran For R-3 : Mr.V.Arul, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ----- https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the third respondent are present and ready to argue the case, but, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In spite of posting the case under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for default. -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar Jrl To

1. The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, K-2, Ayanavaram Police Station, Chennai - 600 023.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.R.C.No.903 of 2009 ks(co) aa27/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/