B.Thirugnanasambandam v. S.Perumal

CMP.Nos.10741 and 10744 of in S.A.No.1007 of 2014 P.RAJAMANICKAM.J., These petitions have been filed to order for substituted service to the respondent.

2. According the the appellant, even though, notices have been sent to the respondent several times, he purposely evaded to receive the said notices and hence he requests to order for substituted service.

3. Considering the said submission, these petitions are allowed.

29.04.2019 (1/2) vv http://www.judis.nic.in

http://www.judis.nic.in