Siva v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.10.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.13716 of 2020 Siva ... Petitioner Vs.
State Rep. By
...Respondent
The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
(Cr.No.496 of 2019) Prayer:
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Connection with the Crime No.496 of 2019 pending on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.T.S.Sivakumar For Respondent : Mr.M. Mohammed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 366 (A) of IPC, in Crime No.496 of 2019, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant viz., Mani is that the petitioner kidnapped the daughter of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the victim is a major and the petitioner fell in love and both of them eloped from the home. He would further submit that the victim girl appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate on 20.09.2020 and a statement was also recorded from the victim and the victim is now in custody of the petitioner. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that as far as the complaint is concerned, the petitioner kidnapped the defacto complainant's daughter. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions;
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the copy of the order is made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Chengam, Thiruvannamalai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter every Monday at 10.30 am., until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
8.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
-sd/- 13/10/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGAM, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/S. K.T.S.SIVAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.6885 CRL OP.13716/2020 Date :13/10/2020 TA-21/10/2020