Suganthi Rajan, v. L.Rajan,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.11.2016 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.M.A .Nos.1635 and 1636 of 2006 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 and C.M.P.No.174 of 2013 Suganthi Rajan .. Appellant in both the CMAs.

-Vs.- L.Rajan .. Respondent in both the CMAs.

Civil Miscellaneous Appeals against the common judgment and decrees dated 18.04.2006 passed by the learned II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai in O.P.No.1825 of 2002 and O.P.No.1631 of 2002.

For appellant ... No appearance in both CMAs For respondent ... Mr.P.K.Rajagopal in both CMAs COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by Pushpa Sathyanarayana,J.) A memo has been filed by the erstwhile counsel for the appellant, viz., A.Arulmozhi stating that she has handed over the entire case papers to the appellant and has also given consent for change of vakalath. The said memo is taken on file.

2. Pursuant to the said memo being filed, the name of the appellant is also printed in the cause list. Even then, today there is no representation on behalf of the appellant either in person or through the counsel. The learned counsel for the respondent is present.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In view of the same, both these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. -s/dAssistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar vj2 To 1.The II Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Chennai 2.The Section Officer VR Section High Court Madras C.M.A.Nos.1635 and ksj(co) aa30/11/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/