Madras High CourtCRL OP/13829/2020dismissed

T.Shanmugam v. State Rep By,

2020-09-07Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2020

1. T.Shanmugam

2. S.Ranjithkumar

3. S.Mohanraj

4. S.Kirubakaran

5. R.Karthikeyan .. Petitioners vs.

State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarur Taluk Police Station, Thiruvarur District.

Crime No.1333/2020.

...Respondent

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the event of their arrest in Crime No.1333 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent : Mr. M. Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 324, 506 (ii) of IPC in Crime No.1333 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to property dispute, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant, the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant using crow bar on face, as a result of which the defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against them. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured is still taking treatment in the hospital. He further submitted that there is no previous case is pending as against the petitioners. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel and the fact that the injured is still taking treatment in the hospital, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for the present.

-sd/- 07/09/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVARUR.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVARUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.P.MUTHAMIZHSELVAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.13829/2020 Date :07/09/2020 cs 21/09/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/